Time to Fill Benchmarks 2026 by Role, Industry and Hiring Model

Current time to fill and time to hire benchmarks run 38 to 63.5 days depending on the clock. See verified data by role, industry and hiring model.

Oz Rashid
Oct 21, 2026
# mins
Time to Fill Benchmarks 2026 by Role, Industry and Hiring Model

Time to Fill Benchmarks 2026 by Role, Industry and Hiring Model

Current time to fill and time to hire benchmarks run 38 to 63.5 days depending on the clock. See verified data by role, industry and hiring model.

Time to Fill Benchmarks 2026 by Role, Industry and Hiring Model

Current time to fill and time to hire benchmarks run 38 to 63.5 days depending on the clock. See verified data by role, industry and hiring model.

So how long does it take to fill a job? I mean, it depends who you're asking, right? The current benchmarks I trust run from 38 days to 63.5 days, and you know what, most of them are right. Why? Everybody's starting and stopping a different clock.

That matters because this metric gets dropped into slide decks and vendor pitches with no definition attached. A lot of times in hiring they talk about time to fill. I'm more interested in time to productivity, right? But you can't get to productivity until the seat is filled, so let's get the fill number right first.

I went and pulled every current time to fill and time to hire benchmark I could verify at its source, and for each one I wrote down where the count starts and where it stops, because that's the part everybody skips. Then I broke them out by role, industry and hiring model, with every source listed at the end. Let's get into it.

Time to Fill in 2026 at a Glance

Four numbers worth knowing before you set a hiring plan.

38 to 63.5 daysThe range across eight headline time to fill and time to hire benchmarksSource · SHRM, Employ, Greenhouse, Ashby, Gem and SmartRecruiters, 2025 to 2026
74% vs 63.5 daysHR decision-makers who say they fill roles in under 30 days, against the platform average from posting to accepted offerSource · Employ survey and platform data, 2025
+23 daysRise in average time to hire for IT and information security roles, 2021 to 2024Source · Gem 2025 Recruiting Benchmarks
24 of 38 daysApproximate share of the median time to hire after the first interviewSource · MSH calculation from SmartRecruiters 2025 medians

MSH Time to Fill Benchmarks 2026 · Compiled by MSH, October 2026 · talentmsh.com/insights/time-to-fill-benchmarks

How Long Does It Take to Fill a Job in 2026?

The short answer is 39 days if you ask HR leaders and closer to two months if you ask some hiring platforms. SHRM's 2026 benchmarking research, drawn from more than 4,600 organizations, reports a median time to fill of 39 calendar days for nonexecutive roles. Employ's 2026 Hiring Benchmarks report, built on platform data from 6,640 customers, clocked an average of 63.5 days from job posting to accepted offer in 2025, according to HR Dive.

Line up the eight headline benchmarks below and the median lands at 45.6 days. That's our math on their published numbers, so cite it as an MSH calculation.

Eight Current Benchmarks, Eight Answers From 38 to 63.5 Days

Headline time to fill and time to hire figures in days, sorted low to high. Each source uses its own clock and statistic. The median of the eight is 45.6.

Platform dataSurvey data
SmartRecruitersMedian time to hire, Sep 2023 to Aug 2024
38 days
SHRMMedian time to fill, nonexecutive, 2026
39 days
GemAverage time to hire, 2024
41 days
SHRMMedian time to fill, executive, 2025
45 days
EmployAverage time to hire, 2025
46.2 days
GreenhouseTime to fill, 2025, units not stated
59.67
AshbyMedian time to first hire, business roles (technical roles 75)
60 days
EmployAverage time to fill, 2025
63.5 days
3040506070

Greenhouse does not state units for its time to fill, so that input is shown as published. Median calculated by MSH.

MSH Time to Fill Benchmarks 2026 · SHRM 2025 and 2026, Employ 2026, Greenhouse 2026, Ashby 2026, Gem 2025, SmartRecruiters 2025 · talentmsh.com/insights/time-to-fill-benchmarks

If you need one number for a workforce plan, pick the benchmark that starts and stops counting where you do. If you need one for a slide, say five to nine weeks and name the source.

Why Do Time to Fill Benchmarks Disagree So Much?

You've heard the cliché, men lie, women lie, numbers don't, and that's not true, because people cherry pick statistics to tell the story they want to tell. With time to fill nobody even has to cherry pick. It's like putting one guy's 40-yard dash next to another guy's 100-meter time and arguing about who's faster, right? Five things move the number before anybody's opinion gets involved.

  1. Where the clock starts. SHRM counts from the day the requisition opens and Ashby from the day the job opens, while Employ's time to fill waits for the job posting. Time to hire is a different measure, because Employ starts it at the candidate's first interaction. Employ reports both on the same data, and they land 17.3 days apart.
  2. Where the clock stops. Most benchmarks that define their clock stop at the accepted offer, Ashby stops when the first hire is made and Gartner's widely repeated 71 days, from a 2019 analysis, ran all the way to the start date.
  3. Median or average. SHRM, SmartRecruiters and Ashby give you medians while Employ and Gem give you averages, which matters more than people think, because a handful of roles stuck open for six months will drag an average up and barely move a median.
  4. Survey or system data. A survey is HR leaders telling you what they remember, and a platform is logging every requisition, including the ones everybody would rather forget.
  5. Who's in the sample. Each platform dataset reflects that vendor's own customers. NSI covers hospitals. SHRM surveys HR leaders at organizations from small shops to companies with 5,000 or more employees.

Every Benchmark Starts and Stops a Different Clock

Where each widely cited time to fill or time to hire figure starts counting and where it stops. A longer bar covers more of the hiring process. A faded start means the publisher does not say where its count begins.

Requisition openedJob postedCandidate entersOffer acceptedStart date

SHRM time to fill · Requisition opened to offer accepted

39 days, median, 2026

Ashby time to first hire · Job opened to first hire made

60 to 75 days, median, 2021 to 2026 data

Employ time to fill · Job posted to offer accepted

63.5 days, average, 2025

Employ time to hire · Candidate's first interaction to offer accepted

46.2 days, average, 2025

Staffing supplier time to fill · Supplier's own time, start point not published

9 days to accept, 14 to start, SIA 2021

Gartner, 2019 · Job posted to start date

71 days, mean, now out of date

MSH Time to Fill Benchmarks 2026 · SHRM 2025 and 2026, Ashby 2026, HR Dive coverage of Employ 2026, Staffing Industry Analysts 2021, TechTarget coverage of Gartner 2019 · talentmsh.com/insights/time-to-fill-benchmarks

The sharpest example came from Employ itself. In its survey of more than 1,200 U.S. HR recruiters and managers, fielded in September 2025, 74% said they fill roles in under 30 days (2025 Recruiter Nation Report). Employ's own platform logged an average of 63.5 days from posting to accepted offer that same year. Same publisher, same year, and the recruiters in the survey remember hiring a whole lot faster than Employ's platform logged it.

Is Hiring Getting Faster or Slower?

That depends on whose numbers you trust. SHRM's survey shows executive time to fill dropping from 60 days in 2022 to 45 days in 2025 (SHRM 2025 report), and its 2026 edition reports a nonexecutive median of 39 days. The platforms tell the opposite story. Greenhouse's Hire Standard shows time to fill climbing from 43.64 in 2022 to 59.67 in 2025, up 37%. Gem's 2025 benchmarks show average time to hire rising from 33 days in 2021 to 41 days in 2024, up 24%.

Surveys Say Hiring Got Faster. Platform Data Says It Got Slower.

Both panels use the same scale. Gem values are days. Greenhouse does not state units for its time to fill, so its values are shown as published.

Survey data, days3040506070202120222023202420252026SHRM executive medianSHRM executive median, 2022, 60 daysSHRM executive median, 2025, 45 daysSHRM executive median, 2026, 45 days6045

SHRM executive median time to fill fell from 60 days in 2022 to 45 in 2025 and held steady in 2026.

Platform data3040506070202120222023202420252026Greenhouse time to fillGreenhouse time to fill, 2022, 43.64Greenhouse time to fill, 2023, 47.12Greenhouse time to fill, 2024, 52.97Greenhouse time to fill, 2025, 59.6743.6459.67Gem average time to hireGem average time to hire, 2021, 33 daysGem average time to hire, 2024, 41 days3341

Greenhouse time to fill rose 37% from 2022 to 2025. Gem average time to hire rose from 33 days in 2021 to 41 in 2024, the only two years Gem published.

MSH Time to Fill Benchmarks 2026 · SHRM 2025 and 2026, Greenhouse The Hire Standard 2026, Gem 2025 Recruiting Benchmarks · talentmsh.com/insights/time-to-fill-benchmarks

Not every platform agrees on the slowdown. Employ's average time to fill dipped from 67.7 days in 2024 to 63.5 days in 2025. But two of the three big platform datasets say hiring is getting slower, so I'd build the plan around the longer number.

So who's lying? I don't think anybody is, because a leader answering a survey is picturing a typical role, and the system is quietly logging the slow ones too.

One driver I see is volume. Greenhouse found applications per job more than doubled, from 116 in 2022 to 244 in 2025, and Employ saw applications per job jump from 207.2 to 257.6 in a single year. It's AI fighting AI, with résumés put together by AI getting shotgunned out to a thousand jobs and AI reading the résumés on the other end, shortlisting or down listing people before anybody picks up a phone. That puts a huge load on recruitment. The trust has completely eroded.

Time to Fill by Role Family

There's no silver bullet here, right? You can put these wide sweeping statistics out there, but depending on your industry and depending on your function, those can all be different factors. The kind of role you're hiring for can swing the number by a month.

IT and Security Roles Now Take the Longest to Hire

Average time to hire by department, Gem customers, 2024, with the change since 2021. Bars run from zero on a 60-day scale.

DepartmentAverage days to hire, 2024Change since 2021Compared with 60 days
IT and information security58+23 days
Engineering53+3 days
Design53+4 days
Product management47−2 days
Legal and compliance47+2 days
Data science43−5 days
Business and strategy42+1 day
Marketing39No change
Customer success37−6 days
People and HR36+1 day
Finance36−1 day
Sales35+1 day
Customer service and support26+4 days
Operations25−1 day

MSH Time to Fill Benchmarks 2026 · Gem 2025 Recruiting Benchmarks, January 2021 to December 2024 platform data · talentmsh.com/insights/time-to-fill-benchmarks

In Gem's 2024 data, IT and information security roles took an average of 58 days to hire, up 23 days since 2021 and the biggest jump of any department, and engineering and design aren't far behind at 53. On the other end, operations and customer support close in 25 and 26 days.

Ashby's 2026 benchmarks, built on data from 2021 to 2026, measure from job opening to first hire, and they point the same way. Technical roles take a median of 75 days against 60 days for business roles. Senior roles take 71 days, 37% longer than the 52 days for junior roles.

Clinical roles run longer still, and the 2026 NSI National Health Care Retention and RN Staffing Report found it takes an average of 78 days to recruit an experienced registered nurse across 527 hospitals, five days faster than the year before. Telemetry nurses take 87 days and ER nurses take 70. If you're building a clinical team, our healthcare recruiting team can help you plan around those numbers.

Time to Fill by Industry

Listen, this is where I'd be careful. With industry numbers, whose customers got counted decides a lot of the answer.

The Same Industry Can Look Fast or Slow Depending on the Source

Time to hire by industry in days, from two platform datasets with different customers and statistics. Manufacturing differs by 19 days between them, an MSH calculation comparing a Gem average with a SmartRecruiters median.

IndustryGem, average days, 2024SmartRecruiters, median days, 2023 to 2024
Financial services63Not reported
Manufacturing3655
Technology and IT services48 (IT services)48 (technology)
HealthcareNot reported41
HospitalityNot reported39
Computer software37Not reported
Life sciences37Not reported
RetailNot reported25
All industries4138 (worldwide), 35 (U.S.)

MSH Time to Fill Benchmarks 2026 · Gem 2025 Recruiting Benchmarks, SmartRecruiters Recruitment Benchmarks 2025 (Sep 2023 to Aug 2024, 95 countries) · talentmsh.com/insights/time-to-fill-benchmarks

Look at manufacturing. Gem's 2024 customers hired manufacturing roles in 36 days on average, and SmartRecruiters' 2025 benchmarks show a 55-day median. Gem's numbers come from its own customers, while SmartRecruiters covers 1.5 million jobs in 95 countries, so they're looking at two very different groups of employers.

Financial services is the slowest industry in Gem's data at 63 days, up 12 days since 2021. If you're hiring for compliance-heavy finance roles, our finance and banking recruiting team can walk you through what's realistic.

Company size gets murkier the closer you look. In HR Dive's coverage of Employ, small and midsize companies took 83.5 days from posting to accepted offer, against 51.7 days for enterprises, while Gem's data, on different size bands and a different clock, points the other way, 34 days for companies under 250 employees and 41 days for companies with 5,000 or more. I don't want to pick a winner there. I'd benchmark against companies your own size.

Time to Fill by Hiring Model

This is the comparison buyers want, and nobody publishes it on one clock. So here's what's out there, with the start point and the year next to every number.

No Public Benchmark Compares Hiring Models on One Clock

The best available public figure for each hiring model, with the clock it runs on and its age.

Hiring modelBest public figureClockSource and yearHow to read it
Employer-reported, nonexecutive roles39 days, medianRequisition opened to offer acceptedSHRM, 2026Not split by hiring channel
Employer-reported, executive roles45 days, medianRequisition opened to offer acceptedSHRM, 2025, held steady in 2026Covers executive roles in general, not retained search
Staffing firm, professional temporary roles9 days to acceptance, 14 days to start, medianSupplier's own time, start point not publishedStaffing Industry Analysts, 2021 surveyFive years old, and the count likely starts later than an employer's
Staffing firm, commercial roles4 to 5 days, medianSupplier's own time, start point not publishedStaffing Industry Analysts, 2021 surveySame caveat as professional roles
High-growth staffing firms56% report average placement under 10 daysSelf-reported placement timeBullhorn GRID 2026, survey of about 2,300 recruitment professionalsA share of firms, not a day count
RPO provider data44 days, averageNot stated in public coverageAMS, an RPO provider, with The Josh Bersin Company, Q1 2023Q1 2023 data, no newer public update found
MSH direct hire28 days, averagePermanent roles, start point not publishedMSH internal data, Oct 2021 to Oct 2023Our own figure, shown with its dates

MSH Time to Fill Benchmarks 2026 · SHRM 2025 and 2026, Staffing Industry Analysts 2021, Bullhorn GRID 2026 via Hunt Scanlon, AMS and Josh Bersin 2023 via SIA, MSH internal data · talentmsh.com/insights/time-to-fill-benchmarks

SHRM's 39-day median isn't split by hiring channel and runs from the opened requisition to the accepted offer. Staffing is where the data gets thin. The most recent public benchmark I could find is still Staffing Industry Analysts' 2021 survey, which found a median of 9 days to candidate acceptance for professional temporary roles and 14 days to start. SIA measures the time a staffing supplier takes to fill a position and doesn't publish where that count begins. Bullhorn's 2026 GRID report adds that 56% of the fastest-growing staffing firms, those growing revenue more than 25%, say their average placement time is under 10 days (Hunt Scanlon coverage).

The newest public figure from a recruitment process outsourcing provider is three years old. AMS, an RPO provider, and The Josh Bersin Company reported an average time to hire of 44 days in the first quarter of 2023 (SIA coverage). If you're weighing that route, our list of top RPO companies compares the providers.

In our own direct hire data from October 2021 to October 2023, the average time to fill for permanent roles was 28 days. Today, qualified candidates typically reach the hiring manager's inbox within 48 to 72 hours of engagement.

Listen, we're in this business, so I'd love to tell you an agency is four times faster than your internal team, but I don't think this evidence says that, because a staffing firm's count likely begins later than yours, contract roles usually run a shorter interview and offer process than a permanent hire and the newest public staffing benchmark is five years old. Compare clocks before you compare vendors. If you're choosing between models, the Sourcing Model Scorecard walks you through direct hire, staff augmentation, managed services and RPO.

Senior hires need their own math. SHRM's 45-day executive median is a general executive number, and a retained search is its own animal, so treat 45 days as a floor when you plan a search for a senior leader. Going a week or two longer because you wanted to make sure you got it right is a lot cheaper than the wrong hire. I only want to hire hell yes.

Where Do the Days Go?

SmartRecruiters' figures put first review at about day 6, first interview at about day 14 and the hire at day 38. That leaves roughly 24 of the 38 days after the first interview. SmartRecruiters doesn't publish where those counts start, and medians don't add up perfectly, so treat that split as a sketch.

Most of the Hiring Clock Runs After the First Interview

Median days, SmartRecruiters platform data, September 2023 to August 2024. SmartRecruiters does not publish its start points, so read the stages as approximate.

Day 0Day 6Day 14Day 38
Start to first review, from the start to around day 6, about 6 days
Review to first interview, around day 6 to around day 14, about 8 days
First interview to hire, around day 14 to around day 38, about 24 days

Stage lengths are MSH calculations from SmartRecruiters figures, which do not add up exactly.

MSH Time to Fill Benchmarks 2026 · SmartRecruiters Recruitment Benchmarks 2025 · talentmsh.com/insights/time-to-fill-benchmarks

Ashby measures the span from first interview to last interview at 14.4 days for business roles and 17.9 days for technical roles. Employ cut the average wait from application to first screen to 7.2 days in 2025, down from 8.3, and its time to hire still rose from 45.7 to 46.2 days. Screening got faster and deciding didn't, and that's where I'd look first.

The front end still matters too. Even now, if you look at most internal talent acquisition departments, they sit back and wait. You've got to get candidates on the phone. After that, here are the two fixes I'd try first.

  1. Scheduling and the interview loop. Hold interview blocks on the calendar before the role opens, and cut any round that asks a question another round already covered.
  2. Offer approval. Agree on the band and who signs off before the final interview starts.

How to Benchmark Your Own Time to Fill

Be data informed, not data driven. I'll use a benchmark to see what the market's doing, and then I want my own numbers sitting next to it before I make a call. Here's how I'd set that up.

  1. Pick one definition and write it down. Requisition opened to offer accepted, SHRM's definition, is a solid default, so use that same definition on every role you track.
  2. Report the median and the 75th percentile. The average hides the roles that are hurting you.
  3. Split before you compare. Compare engineering to engineering and contract to contract, because a blended number hides which team is slow.
  4. Track time to start too. The seat's still empty until somebody shows up on day one. SIA's staffing data puts acceptance and start about five days apart, and notice periods add more for permanent roles.
  5. Put a daily cost on the empty seat. In my experience working with hiring managers over the years, I've only met one company that knew exactly what an open role cost per day. She measured hiring on a per day basis because she knew what it cost to not have that person in, and that was super rare. And listen, there is absolutely a bottom line cost tied to how long a role is open, but I promise you it quadruples if you hire the wrong person and bring them on staff and then you got to remove them.
  6. Then measure time to productivity. I've always called engagement, attrition and tenure the RBIs and home runs of people analytics, the box-score stats, and time to fill belongs on that list. Time to productivity is closer to on-base percentage, the number that tells you whether you're going to win.

If you want more metrics to sit next to time to fill, our guide to talent acquisition KPIs covers them, and our roundup of hiring and recruiting trends has the wider picture. For tech teams, our IT staffing ratios benchmark shows how many IT staff companies run per employee.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Is a Good Time to Fill?

A good time to fill beats the median for your role family, measured the same way your benchmark measures it. For most nonexecutive roles that means beating SHRM's 39-day median from opened requisition to accepted offer. If you track time to hire instead, SmartRecruiters' U.S. median is 35 days. For technical roles, Ashby's 75-day median to first hire is the fairer comparison.

What Is the Difference Between Time to Fill and Time to Hire?

Where does the clock start? Time to fill starts when the role opens, either when the requisition opens or at posting, and ends when a candidate accepts the offer. Time to hire starts when the candidate you hire first enters the process. In Employ's 2025 data, the two were 17.3 days apart.

How Do You Calculate Time to Fill?

Count the calendar days from the day the requisition opens to the day a candidate accepts, do it for every role you filled in the period and report the median and the 75th percentile next to the average.

Why Is Time to Fill Going Up?

Platform data from Greenhouse since 2022 and Gem since 2021 shows hiring taking longer. Applications per job at Greenhouse more than doubled between 2022 and 2025, but in SmartRecruiters' data most of the clock still runs after the first interview.

How Long Does a Staffing Agency Take to Fill a Role?

The most recent public survey, from Staffing Industry Analysts in 2021, found a median of 9 days to candidate acceptance for professional temporary roles and 14 days to start. For commercial roles, the same survey found a median of 4 to 5 days. SIA doesn't publish where its count starts, so compare it to an in-house time to fill with care.

How Long Does It Take to Hire an Executive?

Executive roles took SHRM members a median of 45 days in 2025, down from 60 in 2022, and the 2026 edition says it held steady. Retained C-suite searches often run longer, so plan around your search firm's own track record.

Sources

Love the hires you make

We manage the process to build your team. Your dedicated process manager will build you a sustainable team with great talent.

More about scaling your team

Digital Transformation

Top 8 Best Business Intelligence Consulting Companies

Discover the top business intelligence modernization consulting companies. Learn how MSH can help you do more with your data.

Podcast: Monica Anderton — Building People-First Cultures From Retail to Manufacturing

We’re thrilled to welcome Monica Anderton in this week’s episode. Monica’s journey spans industry giants — including The Home Depot, global metal leader Novelis, and her current role as Chief Human Resources Officer for the North America Packaging and Paper Division of DS Smith, a global heavyweight in sustainable packaging. At each stop, Monica has shaped organizations, built world-class cultures, and led teams through transformative growth. Monica’s experiences are the kind that electrify any HR, leadership, or business community.

Podcast: Ozge Gunaydin Erturk — How Nontraditional Paths Can Lead to an Amazing Career

Host Oz Rashid talks with Ozge Gunaydin Erturk, Chief Marketing Officer of FloSports. Before joining FloSports, Ozge built a powerhouse career at global brands including Amazon, Match.com, and Varsity Tutors. She shares how her engineering background shaped her data-driven marketing approach, what she learned from Amazon’s leadership culture, and how she applies those lessons to building teams, earning trust, and hiring for ownership.

Get A Consultation
Somebody will be in touch with you within the next 24 hours.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.