The Solution
The client's first-pass job description asked for "AI/ML expertise and executive presence." MSH pushed back and rewrote the screen around evidence of production delivery inside a regulated environment, which got the search unstuck.
What MSH Tech screened for, and how. Production evidence, not pilot evidence. Candidates had to name a live system, its users, its failure mode, and who got paged when it broke. Portfolio discipline. Candidates who had never killed anything had never had a real budget. Governance fluency. NIST AI RMF, model risk management under SR 11-7 discipline, ECOA/Reg B adverse action explainability. Adoption mechanics. The BU-leader test. If the candidate could not make that person care, the candidate was out.
The placed candidate came out of a large regional bank's enterprise data organization, with four years spent moving machine learning out of the lab and into servicing and fraud operations. They then led a data science and applied AI function at a mid-market insurance carrier, shipping a document intelligence platform and, more instructively, shutting down two flagship AI initiatives that their own CEO had championed. That second detail was the reason MSH advanced them.
“The scoring rubric was not there to pick winners. It was there so that when I told a business unit president no, I was not the one saying no — the process was. That is what makes it survivable, and that is what makes it stick.”
— Lead, AI Center of Excellence